Roe

Zoom Imaging Solutions, Inc. v. Roe

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 30, 20202:19-cv-01544California2,176 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ----oo0oo---- 11 ZOOM IMAGING SOLUTIONS, INC., No. 2:19-cv-01544 WBS KJN Plaintiff, v. ORDER RE: DEFENDANTS’ MOTION

TO DISMISS

EDWARD ROE; MAXWELL RAMSAY; JON

CROSSEN; CORINNE FUEREST; ANDREW

ALSWEET; KEVIN TOON; JASON

PEEBLER; ABIGAIL NEAL; POWER

BUSINESS TECHNOLOGY, LLC; BRYAN

DAVIS; MAURA LOPEZ; JEFFREY

ORLANDO; JESSICA HINTZ, and DOES 1 through 100, inclusive, 19 Defendant.

21 ----oo0oo---- 22 In its Order of November 8, 2019, this court dismissed, 23 and gave leave to amend, plaintiff’s claims for breach of 24 contract, breach of implied covenant of good faith and fair 25 dealing, misappropriation of trade secrets under state and 26 federal law, intentional interference with contractual relations, 27 violation of California’s Unfair Competition Law (“UCL”), and 28 violation of the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act. (Docket No. 23 at 27-28.) Plaintiff subsequently filed a First Amended Complaint (“FAC”) containing the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.