Reynoso

(PC) Cleveland v. Reynoso

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 31, 20201:20-cv-00154California381 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 LARRY CHARLES CLEVELAND, Case No. 1:20-cv-00154-BAM (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER TRANSFERRING CASE TO THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

v. REYNOSO, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff Larry Charles Cleveland (“Plaintiff”), a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. (ECF No. 1.) Plaintiff has not yet filed a motion to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915, or paid the filing fee for this action. The federal venue statute requires that a civil action, other than one based on diversity jurisdiction, be brought only in “(1) a judicial district where any defendant resides, if all defendants are residents of the State in which the district is located, (2) a judicial district in which a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred, or a substantial part of the property that is the subject of the action is situated, or (3) if there is no district in which an…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.