Dixon

(PS) Bator v. Dixon

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 31, 20202:19-cv-00018California1,568 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ANTHONY BATOR, et al., No. 2:19-cv-00018-TLN-EFB Plaintiffs, v. ORDER KAREN DIXON, et al., Defendants. 16 This matter is before the Court pursuant to Plaintiff Anthony Bator’s (“Plaintiff”) “Motion to Set Aside Order Adopting Findings and Recommendations, and Judgement” (ECF No. 25), in which Plaintiff seeks reconsideration of the Order adopting the Findings and Recommendations to dismiss the action and deny Plaintiff’s motion to amend (ECF Nos. 21–22). For the reasons set forth below, Plaintiff’s motion is DENIED. I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND Plaintiff initiated this action on January 3, 2019, against Defendants Judge Karen Dixon and Siskiyou County Sheriff Jon Lopez, asserting no specific causes of action but alleging that Defendant Dixon made improper rulings against Plaintiff in a state court action. (ECF No. 1.)

Plaintiff’s motion, which seeks reconsideration of the order “filed on September…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.