Barker

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

9 10 BILL BARKER, TAB BACHMAN, AND No. 2:16-cv-01532-TLN-CKD 11 WILLIAM YINGLING, individually and on behalf of others similarly situated, 12 Plaintiffs, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS’

MOTION TO STAY

v.

SWIFT TRANSPORTATION COMPANY

OF ARIZONA, LLC,

16 Defendant.

This matter is before the Court pursuant to Plaintiffs Bill Barker, Tab Bachman, and William Yingling’s (“Plaintiffs”) Motion to Stay. (ECF No. 57.) Defendant Swift Transportation Company of Arizona, LLC (“Defendant”), opposes the motion. (ECF No. 58.) For the reasons set forth below, Plaintiffs’ Motion to Stay is DENIED. I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND Plaintiffs filed a purported Class Action Complaint in the Superior Court of California, Sacramento County, on April 1, 2016, asserting various wage and hour causes of action. (ECF No. 1 at 1–2.) Defendant filed its Notice of Removal July 5, 2016, removing the case to this Court. (ECF No. 1.) On November 16, 2017, Defendant filed a Motion for Summary Judgment that is still pending before the Court.…