(PS) Lull v. County of Sacramento

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 31, 20202:17-cv-01211California1,131 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CHRISTOPHER LULL, No. 2:17-cv-1211-TLN-EFB PS Plaintiff, v. ORDER AFTER HEARING COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO, CORY STEWART, MICHAEL DOANE, and DOES 1 to 100, Defendants. 17 This case was before the court on January 8, 2020, for hearing on plaintiff’s motions to compel further deposition testimony from defendant Cory Stewart (ECF No. 48) and for reconsideration of the court’s March 30, 2018 order dismissing plaintiff’s Fourth Amendment claim without leave to amend (ECF No. 49). Attorney Wendy Motooka appeared on behalf of defendant Stewart, and plaintiff appeared pro se. For the reasons stated on the record, plaintiff’s motion to compel further deposition testimony from defendant Stewart is granted. With respect to plaintiff’s motion for reconsideration, the parties are directed to submit supplemental briefs addressing what constitutes a violation of California Penal Code § 148(a)(1), the required 26 At the hearing, the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.