(PC) Navarro v. Singh,et al.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 3, 20201:19-cv-00018California2,166 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 LARRY H. NAVARRO, Case No.: 1:19-cv-00018-LJO-SKO (PC)

Plaintiff,

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

v. TO DISMISS ACTION

SINGH, et al., 21-DAY DEADLINE

Defendants. 16 Plaintiff Larry H. Navarro brings this action under 42 U.S.C. section 1983, alleging the defendants denied him adequate medical care. (Doc. 11.) Upon screening, the Court found that Plaintiff’s complaint (Doc. 1) neglected to link the defendants to his factual allegations, and granted him leave to amend. (Doc. 8 at 1, 2, 12.) Plaintiff then filed a first amended complaint. (Doc. 9.) Upon its screening of the first amended complaint, the Court found that Plaintiff’s allegations failed to rise to the level of deliberate indifference under the Eighth Amendment, and granted Plaintiff a second opportunity to amend. (Doc. 10 at 5-6.) On December 19, 2019, Plaintiff filed a second amended complaint. (Doc. 11). Despite the prior opportunities to cure the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.