Valinken

(HC) Mendez-Barocio v. Valinken

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 3, 20201:19-cv-01319California1,544 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 10 JUAN MENDEZ-BAROCIO, ) Case No.: 1:19-cv-01319-SKO (HC) ) Petitioner, ) ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR WRIT OF ) HABEAS CORPUS AND PETITIONER’S ) MOTION FOR STAY ) [Docs. 1, 5] v. ) ) ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO ) ENTER JUDGMENT AND CLOSE CASE RICHARD VALINKEN, et al., ) ) Respondents. ) ) ) 19 Petitioner is an immigration detainee proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. The parties have consented to magistrate judge jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c). (Docs. 11, 21.) Petitioner filed the instant petition on September 20, 2019, along with a motion for stay of removal. (Docs. 1, 5.) He challenges his continued detention by the Bureau of Immigration and Customs Enforcement (“ICE”). He claims he should be granted a bond hearing before an Immigration Judge…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.