Chavez

Chavez v. Baranowski

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 4, 20201:19-cv-00597California174 words

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10

RORY CHAVEZ, ) Case No.: 1:19-cv-0597- JLT ) Plaintiff, ) ORDER DIRECTING THE CLERK TO CLOSE ) THE ACTION v. )

JERZY BARANOWSKI, et al., ) (Doc. 14) ) Defendants. ) ) 16

On January 31, 2020, the parties filed a stipulation indicating all parties agreed that the above- captioned action is dismissed in its entirety, with prejudice. (Doc. 14) Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), “the plaintiff may dismiss an action without a court order by filing . . . a stipulation of dismissal signed by all parties who have appeared.” Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997); Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii). Accordingly, based upon the stipulation of the parties, the Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to close this action. 23 IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: February 3, 2020 /s/ Jennifer L. Thurston UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

27 28