Patel

Johnson v. Patel

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 4, 20202:17-cv-01319California2,990 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 SCOTT JOHNSON, No. 2:17-cv-1319-MCE-EFB Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ANIL PATEL, in individual and representative capacity as trustee of the Patel Family Trust; PARVATI PATEL, in individual and representative capacity as trustee of the Patel Family Trust; and

DOES 1-10,

16 Defendants.

18 This case is before the court on plaintiff’s motion for default judgment. ECF No. 18. For the reasons stated below, the motion should be granted.2 I. Background Plaintiff filed this action against defendants Anil Patel (“Anil”) and Parvati Patel (“Parvati”), alleging defendants violated the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”), 42 U.S.C. §§ 12101, et seq., and the California Unruh Civil Rights Act (“Unruh Act”). Compl. (ECF No.

This case was referred to the undersigned pursuant to Eastern District of California Local Rule 302(c)(19). See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). 27 Because oral argument would not have…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.