Bridges
Bridges v. County of Sacramento
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 BROOKS BRIDGES and ANITA No. 2:18-cv-2978-MCE-EFB
STENGEL,
12 Plaintiffs, ORDER v.
COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO, DAWN
WALKER, JENNIFER LAMB,
SACRAMENTO SHERIFF’S
DEPARTMENT OFFICER MA, and DOES 1 through 50, inclusive, 17 Defendants.
19 Defendants filed a motion to compel plaintiffs to provide responses to interrogatories and requests for production of documents, which they noticed for hearing on February 5, 2020. ECF No. 10. Plaintiffs have filed nothing in response to the motion. For the reasons explained below, the February 5 hearing is vacated and defendants’ motion to compel is granted. On October 11, 2019, defendants served plaintiffs by mail with interrogatories and requests for production of documents. Decl. of Nicholas McCinney ISO Mot. to Compel (“McCinney Decl.”), Exs. A-D. According to that declaration, plaintiffs’ responses to the requests were due by November 15, 2019. Fed. R. Civ. P. 33(b)(2), 34(b)(2), 6(d). Plaintiffs, 28 …