(PC) Kamilchu v. Sacramento County Sheriff's
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 EDUARD KAMILCHU, No. 2:18-cv-3266 DB P Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND
RECOMMENDATIONS
SACRAMENTO COUNTY SHERIFF’S, et al., 14 Defendants. 15 Plaintiff is a county inmate proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff has consented to magistrate jurisdiction. (ECF No. 4.) Plaintiff claims his rights were violated in connection with a 2010 driving under the influence (“DUI”) arrest and related court proceedings. By order dated November 4, 2019, plaintiff’s complaint was screened and dismissed with thirty days leave to file an amended complaint. (ECF No. 15.) Thirty days from that date have now passed, and plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint, or otherwise responded to the court’s order. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall randomly assign a district judge to this action. //// //// //// IT IS HEREBY…