(PC) Samuel v. Department of Justice

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 5, 20202:18-cv-02343California1,045 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 HODA SAMUEL, No. 2:18-cv-2343-EFB P Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff, a pro se claimant in federal custody, brings this action against numerous defendants pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents, 403 U.S. 288 (1971). After dismissal of her prior complaints pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A (ECF Nos. 9, 21), she has filed a third amended complaint (ECF No. 24), which the court must now screen.2 ///// ///// ///// 24 1 “Actions under [section] 1983 and those under Bivens are identical save for the 25 replacement of a state actor under [section] 1983 by a federal actor under Bivens.” Van Strum v. Lawn, 940 F.2d 406, 409 (9th Cir. 1991).

2 Pursuant to § 1915(A)(a), the court must “review, before docketing, if feasible or, in any event, as soon as practicable after docketing, a complaint in a civil action in which a prisoner seeks…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.