Kernan

(PC) Freeman v. Kernan

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 5, 20202:17-cv-02233California2,132 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 TRAVON LEON FREEMAN, No. 2:17-cv-02233-TLN-AC Plaintiff, v. ORDER SCOTT KERNAN, et al, Defendants. 16 This matter is before the Court pursuant to Plaintiff Travon Leon Freeman’s (“Plaintiff”) “Objections” to the Order adopting the Findings and Recommendations to deny his Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (ECF No. 12.), which the Court construes as a motion for reconsideration pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b). For the reasons set forth below, Plaintiff’s motion is DENIED. I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, initiated this action on October 25, 2017. (ECF No. 1.) Plaintiff submitted a Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis with his initial Complaint. (ECF No. 2.) On July 15, 2019, the magistrate judge issued findings and recommendations finding Plaintiff to be a three-strike litigant under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a) and recommending the Court deny his…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.