Coleman
Coleman v. Shasta County
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JAMES COLEMAN; and MC HEALTH & No. 2:17-cv-00655-TLN-DMC
WELLNESS CENTER, INC.,
12 Plaintiffs, ORDER v.
COUNTY OF SHASTA; SHASTA
COUNTY SHERIFF’S OFFICE; DEPUTY
TIM ESTES; DEPUTY GARY
NUNNELLY; and DOES 1–10, Defendants. 18 This matter is before the Court on Defendants County of Shasta, Shasta County Sheriff’s Office, Deputy Tim Estes, and Deputy Gary Nunnelly’s (collectively, “Defendants”) Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 13) and Motion to Strike (ECF No. 14). Plaintiffs James Coleman and MC Health and Wellness Center, Inc. (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) opposed both motions. (ECF Nos. 16, 17.) Defendants replied. (ECF Nos. 18, 19.) For the reasons set forth below, the Court GRANTS in part and DENIES in part Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss and DENIES Defendants’ Motion to Strike. /// /// /// I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND Plaintiff Coleman (“Coleman”) is a resident and property owner in Shasta County, California. …