(PS) Sharma v. SITOA Board Members

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 5, 20202:19-cv-01070California2,350 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 BIKRAM SHARMA, No. 2:19-cv-1070-JAM-EFB PS Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS SITOA BOARD MEMBERS (ASIF

MEHMOOD, FARHAD MUHAIUDIN,

MOHAMMAD HAWARNEH, MUSHTQ

A. KING, ZAHID KHAN),

15 Defendants.

17 This case was before the court on August 28, 2019, for hearing on defendants’ motion to dismiss plaintiff’s complaint for failure to state a claim pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure (“Rule”) 12(b)(6) (ECF No. 4) and plaintiff’s motion to remand the case to state court (ECF No. 6). Attorney Sierra Vierra appeared on behalf of defendants, and plaintiff appeared pro se. For the reasons that follow, defendants’ motion must be granted and plaintiff’s motion denied.2 /////

26 1 Plaintiff’s motion, which was styled as a motion to transfer venue, was previously construed by the court as a motion to remand. See ECF No. 8. 27 This case, in which plaintiff is proceeding pro se, is before the undersigned pursuant to Eastern…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.