Kalil

(PC) Lipsey v. Kalil

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 5, 20202:17-cv-01429California1,590 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CHRISTOPHER LIPSEY, JR., No. 2:17-cv-01429-TLN-AC Plaintiff, v. ORDER KALIL, et al., Defendant. 16 Plaintiff Christopher Lipsey, Jr. (“Plaintiff”), a state prisoner proceeding pro se, initiated this civil rights action against Defendants Kalil and K. Spencer (collectively “Defendants”) pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. (ECF No. 1.) This matter is before the Court pursuant to Plaintiff’s “Objections to Magistrate Findings” (ECF No. 19), which this Court construes as a motion for reconsideration of the Order denying his motion to transfer this action to the Sacramento County Superior Court (ECF No. 19). (See also ECF No. 21 (Order construing Plaintiff’s “Objections” to the magistrate judge’s nondispositive order as a motion for reconsideration).) For the reasons set forth below, Plaintiff’s motion is DENIED. I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND Plaintiff initiated this action on July 6, 2017, in the Fresno Division of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.