Newsom

(PC) Brown v. Newsom

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 5, 20202:19-cv-01227California984 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DEXTER BROWN, No. 2:19-cv-01227 MCE DB P Plaintiff, v. ORDER GAVIN NEWSOM, et al., Defendants. 16 On December 11, 2019, plaintiff filed a motion for reconsideration of the district court's order issued November 21, 2019. (ECF No. 16). For the reasons stated below, the motion will be denied. I. RELEVANT FACTS The order plaintiff asks the court to reconsider directs plaintiff to pay the $400.00 filing fee within twenty-one days. (ECF No. 14 at 2). The order to pay the fees is based upon the court’s finding that plaintiff is a three-strikes litigant within the meaning of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g)1 and that he was not in any imminent danger of serious physical harm at the time that he filed the

The court takes judicial notice of the fact that plaintiff was determined to be a three-strikes litigant in Brown v. Sagireddy, No. 2:17-cv-2041 KJM AC P (“Sagireddy”). (See Sagireddy, 26 ECF No. 14). A court may take…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.