Alegria

(PS) Peacemaker v. Alegria

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 5, 20202:20-cv-00118California1,001 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SHIRLY A. PEACEMAKER, et al., No. 2:20-cv-00118-TLN-CKD PS Plaintiffs, v. ORDER SARA ALEGRIA, Defendants. 16 Plaintiffs are proceeding in this action pro se. Plaintiffs have requested authority pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915 to proceed in forma pauperis. This proceeding was referred to this court by Local Rule 302(c)(21). Plaintiffs have submitted the affidavits required by § 1915(a) showing that plaintiffs are unable to prepay fees and costs or give security for them. Accordingly, plaintiffs’ requests to proceed in forma pauperis will be granted. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a). The federal in forma pauperis statute authorizes federal courts to dismiss a case if the action is legally “frivolous or malicious,” fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, or seeks monetary relief from a defendant who is immune from such relief. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2). A claim is legally frivolous when it lacks an arguable basis…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.