(SS) Hermosillo v. Commissioner of Social Security

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 7, 20201:19-cv-00066California5,093 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CHRISTOPHER ADAM HERMOSILLO, ) Case No.: 1:19-cv-0066 - JLT ) Plaintiff, ) ORDER REMANDING THE ACTION PURSUANT ) TO SENTENCE FOUR OF 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) v. ) ) ORDER DIRECTING ENTRY OF JUDGMENT IN COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, ) FAVOR OF PLAINTIFF CHRISTOPHER ADAM ) HERMOSILLO, AND AGAINST DEFENDANT, Defendant. ) THE COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY ) )

Christopher Adam Hermosillo asserts he is entitled to supplemental security income under Title XVI of the Social Security Act. Plaintiff argues the administrative law judge erred in evaluating the medical record and seeks judicial review of the decision to deny his application for benefits. Because the ALJ erred in rejecting limitations identified by consultative physicians, the matter is REMANDED for further proceedings pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). BACKGROUND In March 2015, Plaintiff filed an…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.