Thompson

(PC) Williams v. Thompson

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 7, 20201:19-cv-00330California619 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JOHN WESLEY WILLIAMS, 1:19-cv-00330 JLT (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF

COURT TO ASSIGN DISTRICT JUDGE;

v. ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO

SUBMIT SERVICE DOCUMENTS;

THOMPSON, et al., FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

TO DISMISS NON-COGNIZABLE

Defendants. CLAIMS

Recently, the Court screened the plaintiff’s complaint and found it stated the following claims: (1) a First Amendment retaliation claim Thompson, Houston, Shoemaker, Castalas, and Hawthorne; (2) an Eighth Amendment deliberate indifference claim against Thompson, Houston, Shoemaker; (3) an Eighth Amendment medical indifference claim against Robinson, Castalas, and Perez; and (4) an Eighth Amendment excessive force claim against Scalley, Castalas, and Perez. (Doc. 13.) The Court further determined that no other claims were cognizable as plead. The Court allowed the plaintiff the option to stand on complaint, proceed with it as screened, or…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.