Burnes

(PC) Henley v. Burnes

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 6, 20201:19-cv-01101California491 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ZURI HENLEY, Case No. 1:19-cv-01101-JLT (PC)

Plaintiff, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY ACTION

SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED WITHOUT

v. PREJUDICE FOR FAILURE TO EXHAUST

ADMINISTRATIVE REMEDIES

BURNES, et al., 21-DAY DEADLINE Defendants. 16 Zuri Henley, a state prisoner, initiated this civil rights action on August 13, 2019. (See Doc. 1.) In his first amended complaint, Plaintiff alleges that between August 12, 2019, and August 23, 2019, correctional officers at California State Prison, Corcoran, subjected him to retaliation, including not providing him meals, for filing a lawsuit against CDCR. (See Doc. 7 at 1, 3-4.) Plaintiff states that he filed an administrative grievance, but it “is still currently being processed.” (Id. at 1.) The Prison Litigation Reform Act provides that “[n]o action shall be brought with respect to prison conditions under … any other Federal law … by a prisoner confined in any jail, prison, or other…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.