J.A.J.
J.A.J. v. Jimenez
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10 J.A.J, a minor, through his mother and Next ) Case No.: 1:18-cv-01138-DAD-SKO Friend, CRYSTAL BOTELLO, et al., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION FOR ) APPOINTMENT OF SANTANA JUAREZ v. ) JIMENEZ AS SUCCESSOR GUARDIAN AD ) LITEM FOR MINOR PLAINTIFF J.A.J. State of California Highway Patrol Officer ) EFRAIN JIMENEZ, et al., ) (Doc. 41) ) Defendants. ) ) 17 On July 3, 2019, the Court granted Crystal Botello’s application for appointment as guardian ad 19 litem for her minor son, Plaintiff J.A.J. (Doc. 35; see Doc. 33.) On February 4, 2020, Plaintiffs filed an 20 “Application for Appointment of Santana Juarez Jimenez as Successor Guardian Ad Litem for Minor 21 Plaintiff J.A.J., Successor in Interest to Santana Juarez Gonzalez.” (Doc. 41.) The application states 22 that Ms. Botello “feels the time necessary to act on behalf of [J.A.J.] is overly burdensome” and Mr. 23 Jimenez, Plaintiff J.A.J.’s grandfather, “has executed a Consent to Act as Successor Guardian ad…