J.A.J.

J.A.J. v. Jimenez

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 6, 20201:18-cv-01138California641 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10 J.A.J, a minor, through his mother and Next ) Case No.: 1:18-cv-01138-DAD-SKO Friend, CRYSTAL BOTELLO, et al., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION FOR ) APPOINTMENT OF SANTANA JUAREZ v. ) JIMENEZ AS SUCCESSOR GUARDIAN AD ) LITEM FOR MINOR PLAINTIFF J.A.J. State of California Highway Patrol Officer ) EFRAIN JIMENEZ, et al., ) (Doc. 41) ) Defendants. ) ) 17 On July 3, 2019, the Court granted Crystal Botello’s application for appointment as guardian ad 19 litem for her minor son, Plaintiff J.A.J. (Doc. 35; see Doc. 33.) On February 4, 2020, Plaintiffs filed an 20 “Application for Appointment of Santana Juarez Jimenez as Successor Guardian Ad Litem for Minor 21 Plaintiff J.A.J., Successor in Interest to Santana Juarez Gonzalez.” (Doc. 41.) The application states 22 that Ms. Botello “feels the time necessary to act on behalf of [J.A.J.] is overly burdensome” and Mr. 23 Jimenez, Plaintiff J.A.J.’s grandfather, “has executed a Consent to Act as Successor Guardian ad…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.