Stiles

Stiles v. Walmart, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 6, 20202:14-cv-02234California4,575 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SHARIDAN STILES, et al., No. 2:14-CV-2234-MCE-DMC Plaintiffs, v. ORDER WALMART, INC., et al., Defendants.

AND RELATED COUNTER-ACTIONS

18 Plaintiffs, who are proceeding with retained counsel, bring this civil action alleging intellectual property and antitrust claims. Pending before the court are the following four discovery motions:

Motions Filed by Plaintiffs

ECF No. 324 Motion to compel defendant American International Industries, Inc., (AI) to provide further responses to requests for production, set two.

ECF No. 334 Motion to compel deposition testimony from Walmart’s Rule 30(b)(6) witness.

/ / /

/ / / Motions Filed by Walmart

ECF No. 332 Motion to enforce court’s order regarding depositions and for a protective order. 3 ECF No. 336 Motion for a protective order regarding Walmart’s Rule 30(b)(6) witness. The…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.