Pfeiffer

(PC) Martinez v. Pfeiffer

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 6, 20201:19-cv-01684California2,124 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

RICARDO MARTINEZ ) Case No.: 1:19-cv-01684-DAD-SAB (PC) ) Plaintiff, ) ) FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS v. ) RECOMMENDING ACTION BE DISMISSED

FOR FAILURE TO STATE A COGNIZABLE

C. PFEIFFER, et.al., ) CLAIM FOR RELIEF, AND DENYING ) PLAINTIFF’S THIRD MOTION FOR Defendants. ) APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL AS MOOT ) ) [ECF Nos. 21, 22] ) )

Plaintiff Ricardo Martinez is appearing pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Currently before the Court is Plaintiff’s second amended complaint and third motion for appointment of counsel, filed January 27, 2020. (ECF Nos. 21, 22.) I. SCREENING REQUIREMENT The Court is required to screen complaints brought by prisoners seeking relief against a governmental entity or officer or employee of a governmental…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.