(PC) Tanksley v. Sacramento County Jail

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 6, 20202:18-cv-03158California1,174 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MOODY WOODROW TANKSLEY, No. 2:18-cv-3158-EFB P Plaintiff, v. ORDER SACRAMENTO COUNTY JAIL, et al. , Defendants. 16 Plaintiff, a former county inmate, proceeds without counsel in this action brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. He has also filed an application to proceed in forma pauperis (ECF No. 2). Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis Plaintiff’s application makes the showing required by 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(1). Accordingly, his request to proceed in forma pauperis is granted. Screening I. Legal Standards Pursuant to § 1915(e)(2), the court must dismiss the case at any time if it determines the allegation of poverty is untrue, or if the action is frivolous or malicious, fails to state a claim on which relief may be granted, or seeks monetary relief against an immune defendant. Although pro se pleadings are liberally construed, see Haines v.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.