(CONSENT)(PS) Grasty v. San Juan Unified School District

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 7, 20202:18-cv-03242California6,019 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 WILLIAM DEREK GRASTY, No. 2:18–cv–3242–KJN PS Plaintiff, ORDER ON DEFENDANT’S MOTION

FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND

v. PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO AMEND SAN JUAN UNIFIED SCHOOL DIST., (ECF Nos. 29, 31.) Defendant. 16 This case involves the District’s alleged age discrimination against Grasty. (See ECF No. 21.) In the First Amended Complaint, Grasty alleged one claim of age discrimination for the District’s failure to interview and hire him for a “Director of Equity” position. (ECF No. 6.) The District now moves for summary judgment, which Grasty opposes. (ECF Nos. 29, 35.) Additionally, Grasty requested leave to amend in order to add discrimination claims based on race and gender, which the District opposes. (ECF Nos. 31, 36.) After carefully considering the written briefing, the record, and the applicable law, the Court GRANTS the District’s motion for summary judgment and DENIES Grasty’s motion to amend. /// 27…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.