(PC) Britton v. California Superior Court

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 BOBBY RAY BRITTON, JR., No. 2: 18-cv-2974 KJN P Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

CALIFORNIA SUPERIOR COURT, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is proceeding, without counsel, with a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Pending before the court is plaintiff’s second amended complaint. (ECF No. 24.) Named as defendants are Sacramento County Deputy Sheriff Hickison, Sacramento City Code Enforcer Rolison, Sacramento City employee Santos and Deidra Daniels, identified as plaintiff’s ex-wife. (Id. at 9.) In the section of the second amended complaint describing plaintiff’s claims, plaintiff names several other defendants. The second amended complaint contains four claims. Claim 1 Plaintiff’s Allegations Plaintiff alleges that he was subject to a false arrest on July 22, 2018. Plaintiff appears to allege that officers were called to the home of the victim based on a 911 call…