(PS)Crago

(PS)Crago v. Sacramento Sheriff

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 6, 20202:19-cv-02510California816 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MARY J. CRAGO, No. 2:19-cv-02510-TLN-CKD PS Plaintiff, v. ORDER SACRAMENTO SHERIFF, et al., Defendant. 16 Plaintiff is proceeding in this action pro se. Plaintiff has requested authority pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915 to proceed in forma pauperis. This proceeding was referred to this court by Local Rule 302(c)(21). Plaintiff has submitted the affidavit required by § 1915(a) showing that plaintiff is unable to prepay fees and costs or give security for them. Accordingly, the request to proceed in forma pauperis will be granted. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a). The federal in forma pauperis statute authorizes federal courts to dismiss a case if the action is legally “frivolous or malicious,” fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, or seeks monetary relief from a defendant who is immune from such relief. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2). It appears plaintiff lists Sacramento Sheriff # 1 and #2 and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.