(PC) Jorgenson v. United States of America

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 10, 20201:17-cv-00817California5,201 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

7 PAUL JORGENSON, Case No. 1:17-cv-00817-NONE-EPG (PC) 8 Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS, RECOMMENDING THAT DEFENDANTS v. BE GRANTED SUMMARY JUDGMENT ON PLAINTIFF’S BATTERY CLAIMS RICHARD B. HAAK, M.D., et al., (ECF NOS. 29 & 46) Defendants. OBJECTIONS, IF ANY, DUE WITHIN

TWENTY-ONE DAYS

13 14 I. BACKGROUND Paul Jorgenson (“Plaintiff”) is a federal prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this action. This case now proceeds on Plaintiff’s Second Amended Complaint (“SAC”), which was filed on July 12, 2018. (ECF No. 19). This case is proceeding on Plaintiff’s state tort claims for medical negligence against Defendants Haak, Randhawa, and Emanuel Medical Center (“Defendants”), and his state tort claims for battery against Defendants Haak and Emanuel Medical Center. (ECF No. 21, p. 2; ECF No. 95, p. 3; ECF No. 104, p. 2; ECF No. 105, p. 2). On…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.