Osburn

Osburn v. Countrywide Home Loans

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 10, 20201:19-cv-00246California5,973 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RONALD OSBURN and SADIE No. 1:19-cv-00246-DAD-SAB

OSBURN,

12 Plaintiffs, ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ v. MOTIONS TO DISMISS ON CLAIM PRECLUSION GROUNDS COUNTRYWIDE HOME LOANS, et al., (Doc. Nos. 12, 14, 19) Defendants.

17 This matter is before the court on three separate motions to dismiss the complaint in this action filed by pro se plaintiffs Ronald Osburn and Sadie Osburn (collectively, “plaintiffs”). (Doc. Nos. 12, 14, 19.) A hearing on the motions was held on May 21, 2019. Plaintiff Ronald Osburn appeared telephonically, plaintiff Sadie Osburn did not appear, and attorneys Ethan Schatz, Erin Illman, and Megan Clark appeared telephonically on behalf of defendants. For the reasons set forth below, the court will grant the pending motions without leave to amend and with prejudice on the grounds of claim preclusion. BACKGROUND …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.