Mahoney

Mahoney v. City of Sacramento

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 10, 20202:20-cv-00258California2,398 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 PATRICK MAHONEY, et al., No. 2:20-cv-00258-KJM-CKD Plaintiffs, v. ORDER CITY OF SACRAMENTO, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiffs Patrick Mahoney, Caroline Kennedy, Suracha Xiong and Brandon Allen, Sr. sought a temporary restraining order from the court on February 4, 2020. Mot. for TRO, ECF No. 2. Defendants City of Sacramento and Sacramento Police Department filed an opposition on February 5, 2020. Opp’n, ECF No. 6. Plaintiffs replied on February 6, 2020. ECF No. 9. Having considered the parties’ arguments and the applicable law, the court DENIES plaintiffs’ motion. As explained below, on the current record it is not clear plaintiffs have a federal case. I. BACKGROUND Plaintiffs Patrick Mahoney, Caroline Kennedy, Suracha Xiong and Brandon Allen, Sr. are persons who are homeless, who live in tents placed along North B Street west of 7th Street within the City of Sacramento. Compl., ECF No. 1 ¶¶ 4–7. …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.