Rudas

(PC) Murphy v. Rudas

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 10, 20202:20-cv-00073California4,202 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MONRELL D. MURPHY, No. 2:20-cv-0073 TLN DB P Plaintiff, RUDAS, et al.. ORDER Defendants. 15 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Before the court are plaintiff’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis and plaintiff’s complaint for screening. For the reasons set forth below, this court grants plaintiff’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis, finds plaintiff has stated a cognizable claim, and gives plaintiff an opportunity to either amend his complaint or proceed on the cognizable claim in his current complaint. IN FORMA PAUPERIS Plaintiff has submitted a declaration that makes the showing required by 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a). Accordingly, the request to proceed in forma pauperis will be granted. Plaintiff is required to pay the statutory filing fee of $350.00 for this action. 28 U.S.C. §§ 1914(a), 1915(b)(1). By this order, plaintiff will be assessed…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.