CDCR

(PC) O'Connor v. CDCR

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 10, 20202:19-cv-01867California1,572 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 GLENN O’CONNOR, No. 2:19-cv-1867-WBS-EFB P Plaintiff, v. ORDER CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF

CORRECTIONS AND

REHABILITATION, et al., Defendants. 17 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding without counsel in this action brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. He has filed an application to proceed in forma pauperis (ECF Nos. 8, 10) and a motion for extension of time and/or stay (ECF No. 9). Application to Proceed in Forma Pauperis and Motion for Extension/Stay Plaintiff’s application makes the showing required by 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(1) and (2). Accordingly, by separate order, the court directs the agency having custody of plaintiff to collect and forward the appropriate monthly payments for the filing fee as set forth in 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(1) and (2). Further, plaintiff’s motion for an extension of time and/or stay in order to submit a completed in forma pauperis application (ECF No. 9) is denied…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.