(PC) Charles Davis v. Hanford Police Department
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 CHARLES DAVIS, 1:19-cv-01204-DAD-EPG (PC)
Plaintiff,
FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS,
v. RECOMMENDING THAT THIS CASE BE
DISMISSED FOR FAILURE TO STATE A
HANFORD POLICE DEPARTMENT, et al., CLAIM, FAILURE TO PROSECUTE, AND
FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH A COURT
Defendants. ORDER
(ECF Nos. 1, 7)
TWENTY-ONE DAY DEADLINE
16 Plaintiff, Charles Davis, is proceeding pro se in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 17 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff initiated this action on September 3, 2019, by filing a complaint (ECF 18 No. 1). In his complaint, Plaintiff alleges that Defendants, the Hanford Police Department and the 19 Department of Adult Parole Operations, violated Plaintiff’s constitutional rights when they 20 arrested him in retaliation for Plaintiff’s filing of a previous lawsuit. 21 On January 2, 2020, the Court screened the Complaint and found that it fails to state a 22 cognizable claim against Defendants. (ECF No. 7). The Court gave Plaintiff thirty days…