(PC) Charles Davis v. Hanford Police Department

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 11, 20201:19-cv-01204California2,951 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 CHARLES DAVIS, 1:19-cv-01204-DAD-EPG (PC)

Plaintiff,

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS,

v. RECOMMENDING THAT THIS CASE BE

DISMISSED FOR FAILURE TO STATE A

HANFORD POLICE DEPARTMENT, et al., CLAIM, FAILURE TO PROSECUTE, AND

FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH A COURT

Defendants. ORDER

(ECF Nos. 1, 7)

TWENTY-ONE DAY DEADLINE

16 Plaintiff, Charles Davis, is proceeding pro se in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 17 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff initiated this action on September 3, 2019, by filing a complaint (ECF 18 No. 1). In his complaint, Plaintiff alleges that Defendants, the Hanford Police Department and the 19 Department of Adult Parole Operations, violated Plaintiff’s constitutional rights when they 20 arrested him in retaliation for Plaintiff’s filing of a previous lawsuit. 21 On January 2, 2020, the Court screened the Complaint and found that it fails to state a 22 cognizable claim against Defendants. (ECF No. 7). The Court gave Plaintiff thirty days…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.