Mendoza

Mendoza v. City Of Fresno

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 11, 20201:19-cv-01500California3,228 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JENNIFER MENDOZA, Case No. 1:19-cv-01500-DAD-EPG 11 Plaintiff, SCREENING ORDER REQUIRING

PLAINTIFF TO:

v. 13 (1) FILE A FIRST AMENDED

CITY OF FRESNO, et al., COMPLAINT; Defendants. OR (2) NOTIFY THE COURT THAT SHE

WISHES TO STAND ON HER

COMPLAINT, SUBJECT TO THIS

COURT ISSUING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS TO THE

DISTRICT JUDGE CONSISTENT WITH

THIS ORDER

20 (ECF No. 1)

THIRTY (30) DAY DEADLINE

22 Plaintiff, Jennifer Mendoza, is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this action brought pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1983. The Complaint, filed October 23, 2019, alleges claims against the City of Fresno, Adam Estrada, Matthew Clifton, Scott Payn, Kenda Navarro, and Sharon Takayama. (ECF No. 1.) The Court has screened the Complaint and has determined that Plaintiff has failed to state any cognizable claim. //// I. SCREENING REQUIREMENT …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.