Mendoza
Mendoza v. City Of Fresno
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 11, 20201:19-cv-01500California3,228 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JENNIFER MENDOZA, Case No. 1:19-cv-01500-DAD-EPG 11 Plaintiff, SCREENING ORDER REQUIRING
PLAINTIFF TO:
v. 13 (1) FILE A FIRST AMENDED
CITY OF FRESNO, et al., COMPLAINT; Defendants. OR (2) NOTIFY THE COURT THAT SHE
WISHES TO STAND ON HER
COMPLAINT, SUBJECT TO THIS
COURT ISSUING FINDINGS AND
RECOMMENDATIONS TO THE
DISTRICT JUDGE CONSISTENT WITH
THIS ORDER
20 (ECF No. 1)
THIRTY (30) DAY DEADLINE
22 Plaintiff, Jennifer Mendoza, is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this action brought pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1983. The Complaint, filed October 23, 2019, alleges claims against the City of Fresno, Adam Estrada, Matthew Clifton, Scott Payn, Kenda Navarro, and Sharon Takayama. (ECF No. 1.) The Court has screened the Complaint and has determined that Plaintiff has failed to state any cognizable claim. //// I. SCREENING REQUIREMENT …