Ruff
(PC) Sahm v. Ruff
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 STANLEY CARL SAHM, No. 2:19-cv-02515 GGH P Petitioner, v. ORDER CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF
CORRECTIONS AND
REHABILITATION, Respondent. 17 Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Petitioner has not, however, filed an in forma pauperis affidavit or paid the required filing fee ($5.00). See 28 U.S.C. §§ 1914(a); 1915(a). Petitioner will be provided the opportunity to either submit the appropriate affidavit in support of a request to proceed in forma pauperis or submit the appropriate filing fee. The Habeas Petition Petitioner is currently serving a sentence of 30 years to life from a 1988 Sacramento County Superior Court conviction for two counts of second-degree murder. In his habeas petition, petitioner challenges his Comprehensive Risk Assessment by the Board of Parole Hearings dated September 19, 2019 based on fraudulent…