(PS) Aussieker v. Staccato Properties, LLC

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MARK AUSSIEKER and KIMBERLY No. 2:19-cv-00089-TLN-DB

AUSSIEKER,

12 Plaintiffs, ORDER v. STACCATO PROPERTIES, LLC, et al., Defendants. 17 Plaintiffs Mark Aussieker and Kimberly Aussieker (collectively “Plaintiffs”) are proceeding pro se in the above-entitled action. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On December 26, 2019, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations which were served on Plaintiffs and which contained notice to Plaintiffs that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days after service of the findings and recommendations. The fourteen-day period has expired, and Plaintiffs have not filed any objections to the findings and recommendations. Accordingly, the Court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate…