Warren
(PC) Corral v. Warren
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DYLAN SCOTT CORRAL, No. 2:18-cv-00024-TLN-CKD Plaintiff, v. ORDER WARREN, et al., Defendants. 16 Dylan Scott Corral (“Plaintiff”), a state prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302 and is before the Court on Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s Second Amended Complaint (ECF No. 38.) On January 13, 2020, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. (ECF No. 49.) Neither party has filed objections to the findings and recommendations. Accordingly, the Court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). …