(PS) Mohamed v. United States

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 12, 20202:18-cv-02303California423 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ABDO YAHRA MOHAMED, No. 2:18-cv-02303-TLN-EFB Plaintiff, v. ORDER UNITED STATES, Defendant. 16 Plaintiff Abdo Yahra Mohamed (“Plaintiff”), proceeding pro se, owns a convenience store that has been permanently disqualified from participating as a retailer in the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program. On August 23, 2018, Plaintiff filed a complaint seeking an appeal of the disqualification under 7 U.S.C.A. § 2023(a) and declaratory judgement under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2201. (ECF No. 1.) This matter is before the Court on Defendant’s motion to dismiss the second cause of action. (ECF No. 13.) Plaintiff failed to oppose the motion to dismiss and the magistrate judge filed an order for Plaintiff to show cause why sanctions should not be imposed for failure to file a timely opposition or a statement of non-opposition to Defendant’s motion. (ECF No. 15.) Plaintiff failed to do so by the deadline. On January 9, 2020, the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.