Kernan

(PC) Thornberry v. Kernan

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 13, 20202:17-cv-00953California2,314 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DANIEL LEE THORNBERRY, No. 2:17-CV-0953-TLN-DMC-P Plaintiff, v. ORDER J. BAL, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff, a prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Pending before the court are two motions to compel, both initiated by plaintiff. See ECF Nos. 78 and 84. Defendants have filed responses to both motions. See ECF Nos. 85 and 90. / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / I. SUMMARY OF DISCOVERY IN DISPUTE In his motions, plaintiff challenges defendants’ responses to certain requests for production, sets one and two. Plaintiff also references defendants’ failure to respond to interrogatories and requests for admissions. A. Requests for Production of Documents Plaintiff states that he served his “first request for production of documents to counsel for the defendants” on July 19, 2018. …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.