Le

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 MICHAEL L. HANSON, No. 2:19-cv-955-TLN-EFB PS Plaintiff, v. ORDER DIN NGOC LE, individually and dba D&V 96 Cent Store Plus; VAN THI TROUNG, individually and dba D&V 96 Cent Store Plus, 15 Defendants.

17 Plaintiff seeks leave to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915. His 18 declaration makes the showing required by 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(1) and (2). See ECF No. 2. 19 Accordingly, the request to proceed in forma pauperis is granted. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a). 20 Determining that plaintiff may proceed in forma pauperis does not complete the required 21 inquiry. Pursuant to § 1915(e)(2), the court must dismiss the case at any time if it determines the 22 allegation of poverty is untrue, or if the action is frivolous or malicious, fails to state a claim on 23 which relief may be granted, or seeks monetary relief against an immune defendant. For the 24 reasons provided below, plaintiff is ordered to show cause why this action should not be 25 dismissed as frivolous. 26…