(PS) Selck v. City of Sacramento

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 13, 20202:19-cv-00341California2,528 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 MORREY SELCK, No. 2:19-cv-0341-JAM-EFB PS Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

CITY OF SACRAMENTO, Defendant. 15 Several motions are pending in this action, which are addressed herein1: 1. Defendant’s motion to dismiss plaintiff’s complaint pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure (“Rule”) 12(b)(6). ECF No. 5. 2. Plaintiff’s “Motion to Order Relevant Documentation for Public Records,” which is construed as a motion to compel the production of documents. ECF No. 11. 3. Plaintiff’s “Motion to Initiate Criminal Investigation,” which is construed as a motion for injunctive relief. ECF No. 15. 4. Also pending is the court’s May 10, 2019 order directing plaintiff to show cause why sanctions should not be imposed for failure to timely file an opposition or statement of non- opposition to defendant’s motion. ECF No. 10.

This case, in which plaintiff is proceeding…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.