(PS) Selck v. City of Sacramento
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 MORREY SELCK, No. 2:19-cv-0341-JAM-EFB PS Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND
RECOMMENDATIONS
CITY OF SACRAMENTO, Defendant. 15 Several motions are pending in this action, which are addressed herein1: 1. Defendant’s motion to dismiss plaintiff’s complaint pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure (“Rule”) 12(b)(6). ECF No. 5. 2. Plaintiff’s “Motion to Order Relevant Documentation for Public Records,” which is construed as a motion to compel the production of documents. ECF No. 11. 3. Plaintiff’s “Motion to Initiate Criminal Investigation,” which is construed as a motion for injunctive relief. ECF No. 15. 4. Also pending is the court’s May 10, 2019 order directing plaintiff to show cause why sanctions should not be imposed for failure to timely file an opposition or statement of non- opposition to defendant’s motion. ECF No. 10.