Lizarraga

(PC) Sherman v. Lizarraga

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 13, 20202:19-cv-00569California2,823 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RANDY GLENN SHERMAN, No. 2: 19-cv-0569 WBS KJN P Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

JOE LIZARRAGA, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner, proceeding without counsel, with a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Pending before the court is plaintiff’s second amended complaint. (ECF No. 16.) For the reasons stated herein, the undersigned recommends that this action be dismissed. In the section of the complaint form for identifying defendants, plaintiff lists the following defendants: Joe Lizarraga, A. Krouse, J. Lyman, C. Cassidy and C. Lamb. (Id. at 1-2.) However, in the discussion of his three claims, plaintiff identifies additional defendants. The undersigned herein discusses each of plaintiff’s claims and the additional defendants. Claim One In claim one, plaintiff alleges violation of his right to due process and equal protection. (Id. at 3.) Plaintiff…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.