Allen

Allen v. Credit Collection Services, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 18, 20202:18-cv-00929California2,942 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CAMERON ALLEN, No. 2:18-cv-00929-MCE-KJN Plaintiff, v. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER CREDIT COLLECTION

SERVICES, INC.,

15 Defendant. 16 17 Through the present action, Plaintiff Cameron Allen (“Plaintiff”) seeks damages from Defendant Credit Collection Services, Inc. (“CCS” or “Defendant”), a collection agency, under the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, 15 U.S.C.S. §§ 1692 et seq., (“FDCPA”) and its California counterpart, the Rosenthal Act, Cal. Civ. Code §§ 1788 et seq, (“Rosenthal Act”). ECF No. 1. According to Plaintiff, the telephone calls he received from CCS rose to the level of conduct intended to “harass, oppress, or abuse” him in connection with the collection of his debt. Compl., ECF No. 1 at 4-5. Presently before the Court is Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment pursuant to Federal Rule

26 1 While Plaintiff’s Complaint, filed April 16, 2018, also included a cause of action claim under the Telephone Consumer Protection Act, 47 U.S.C. §…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.