(HC) Broussard v. United States

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 14, 20201:19-cv-00164California883 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CURLEY JOHN BROUSSARD, JR., Case No. 1:19-cv-00164-AWI-JDP (HC) Petitioner, FINDINGS AND RECOMMEDATIONS TO

DISMISS PETITION AS UNTIMELY

v.

OBJECTIONS DUE IN FOURTEEN DAYS

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ECF No. 1 Respondent.

16 Petitioner Curley John Broussard, Jr., a state prisoner without counsel, seeks a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. ECF No. 1. On January 15, 2020, we screened petitioner’s habeas petition, found it untimely, and ordered petitioner to show cause why his petition should not be summarily dismissed for failure to comply with the statute of limitations. ECF No. 8. We granted petitioner fourteen days to respond to the order to show cause. See id. The time for responding has passed and petitioner has failed to respond. We recommend that the petition be dismissed. Discussion Under Rule 4 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases, the assigned judge must promptly examine the habeas petition and must order a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.