(PC) Hogue v. Sacramento Police Department

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 BRIAN HOGUE, No. 2:17-cv-0434-MCE-EFB P Plaintiff, v. ORDER SACRAMENTO POLICE DEPARTMENT, et al., 15 Defendants.

17 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding without counsel in an action brought under 42 18 U.S.C. § 1983. On January 7, 2020, the City of Sacramento filed a motion to compel. ECF No. 19 25. Plaintiff has not filed an opposition or a statement of no opposition to the motion. 20 In cases in which one party is incarcerated and proceeding without counsel, motions 21 ordinarily are submitted on the record without oral argument. E.D. Cal. Local Rule 230(l). 22 “Opposition, if any, to the granting of the motion shall be served and filed by the responding 23 party not more than twenty-one (21), days after the date of service of the motion. ” Id. A 24 responding party’s failure “to file an opposition or to file a statement of no opposition may be 25 deemed a waiver of any opposition to the granting of the motion and may result in the imposition 26 of sanctions.” …