Roe

Zoom Imaging Solutions, Inc. v. Roe

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 14, 20202:19-cv-01544California1,109 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ----oo0oo----

ZOOM IMAGING SOLUTIONS, INC., NO. 2:19-cv-01544 WBS KJN Plaintiff, v. EDWARD ROE; MAXWELL RAMSAY;

JON CROSSEN; CORINNE FUERST;

ANDREW ALSWEET; KEVIN TOON;

JASON PEEBLER; ABIGAIL NEAL;

POWER BUSINESS TECHNOLOGY

LLC; BRYAN DAVIS; MAURA

LOPEZ; JEFFREY ORLANDO; JESSICA HINTZ; and DOES 1 through 100, inclusive, Defendant. 21 ----oo0oo---- STATUS (PRETRIAL SCHEDULING) ORDER After reviewing the parties’ Joint Status Report, the court hereby vacates the Status (Pretrial Scheduling) Conference scheduled for February 18, 2020, and makes the following findings and orders without needing to consult with the parties any further. I. SERVICE OF PROCESS All defendants have been served, and no further service is permitted without leave of court, good cause having been shown under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 16(b). II. JOINDER OF PARTIES/AMENDMENTS No further…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.