Rojas

(PC) Martinez v. Rojas

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 19, 20201:16-cv-01467California1,209 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ANTONIO MARTINEZ, Case No. 1:16-cv-01467-DAD-BAM (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER VACATING JANUARY 24, 2020

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

v. (ECF No. 62) F. ROJAS,

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF A THIRD

Defendant. EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE AN

OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT’S MOTION

FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (ECF No. 64) ORDER REQUIRING DEFENDANT ROJAS

TO RE-SERVE THE SEPTEMBER 10, 2019

MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT ON

PLAINTIFF WITHIN SEVEN DAYS

THIRTY (30) DAY DEADLINE

21 Plaintiff Antonio Martinez is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On September 10, 2019, Defendant F. Rojas filed a motion for summary judgment for failure to exhaust administrative remedies. (ECF No. 52.) Plaintiff was provided with notice of the requirements for opposing a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.