Arredondo

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DAVID FALLS, Case No. 1:19-cv-00441-SAB (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO

RANDOMLY ASSIGN DISTRICT JUDGE TO

v. ACTION A. ARREDONDO, et al., FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION TO

DISMISS ACTION, WITHOUT PREJUDICE,

Defendants. FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE AND

FAILURE TO OBEY COURT ORDERS

16 (ECF Nos. 10, 13, 16)

FOURTEEN (14) DAY DEADLINE

18 Plaintiff David Falls is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. I. INTRODUCTION On August 26, 2019, the Court screened Plaintiff’s complaint and found that Plaintiff stated a cognizable claim against Defendant Arredondo, in his individual capacity, for excessive force in violation of the Eighth Amendment, but failed to state any other cognizable claims against any other defendants. (ECF No. 10.) The Court ordered…