Bettis

Bettis v. Internal Revenue Service

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 18, 20201:20-cv-00148California1,821 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10 11 KIRELL FRANCIS BETTIS TRUST and No: 1:20-cv-00148-NONE-SKO KIRELL F. BETTIS-TAYLOR,

ORDER REQUIRING PLAINTIFF TO PAY

Plaintiffs, THE FILING FEE IN THIS ACTION

v. (Doc. No. 1) INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE (IRS),

K. GREEN, and A. RASCHKE, TWENTY-ONE (21) DAY DEADLINE

16 Defendants. 17 I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff Kirell F. Bettis-Taylor1, a state prisoner, is appearing pro se in this civil rights action. On January 29, 2020, plaintiff filed a complaint with the court, but did not file an application to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP) nor did he pay the filing fee. Pursuant to the Prison Litigation Reform Act (PLRA), a prisoner may not proceed IFP “if the prisoner has, on 3 or more prior occasions, while incarcerated or detained in any facility, brought an action or appeal in a court of the United States that was dismissed on the grounds that it is frivolous, malicious, or fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, unless the prisoner is under…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.